70-400G in Atlanta

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
calpon
Initiate
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:35 pm

70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by calpon »

David...I hope you don't mind, but I will link to Dyxum instead of re-posting this here.

This link will show a visual comparison to the 70-200G and the Tamron 200-500 as well as a couple images taken at the feeder. I am heading off to Florida on Saturday for a bit of birding and I will post along the way if the hotel has adequate high speed service. I have rented a Sony 1.4 TC and a Kenko Pro 1.4(1.5)TC to see if I can get some extra reach. If the Kenko has adequate AF and IQ is somewhat close, I will get it, but I want to compare the IQ of these 2.
Image
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

No problem linking to Dyxum, but why not link the images to a post here?

I often ignore posts which only contain links, not images, and I am sure many others do. If you don't see the image directly on opening the post, it's not as interesting.

David
calpon
Initiate
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:35 pm

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by calpon »

David Kilpatrick wrote:No problem linking to Dyxum, but why not link the images to a post here?

I often ignore posts which only contain links, not images, and I am sure many others do. If you don't see the image directly on opening the post, it's not as interesting.

David
Alright...will do.

Image
Image
Image
Image
calpon
Initiate
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:35 pm

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by calpon »

f/7.1, 1/500
Image

f/6.3, 1/500
Image

f/8, 1/1000
Image
Image
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Few comments with your permission:

1- Very nice bird shots, but may I ask how much sharpening on PP? Or is the lens that sharp?
2- In my opinion I think the knob for fixing the tripod collar on the Tamron is much much better than the Sony ones. It should be much easier tightening/loosening the Tamron one :? Just let me know your thoughts on this.
3- I like the bokeh on 400mm (btw, are the pictures cropped?)
4- Now you've done it, :evil: I don't know which to discard from my list the 70-300 or 70-400

Thanks for sharing.
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
rogprov
Oligarch
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:10 am
Location: Gloucester, UK
Contact:

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by rogprov »

Very nice, thanks for sharing ... be great to see them compared at maximum extension :)
Roger
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

When my wife sees me looking at pictures like the first three on this page, she calls it "camera p*rn."
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
calpon
Initiate
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:35 pm

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by calpon »

Dr. Harout wrote:Few comments with your permission:

1- Very nice bird shots, but may I ask how much sharpening on PP? Or is the lens that sharp?
2- In my opinion I think the knob for fixing the tripod collar on the Tamron is much much better than the Sony ones. It should be much easier tightening/loosening the Tamron one :? Just let me know your thoughts on this.
3- I like the bokeh on 400mm (btw, are the pictures cropped?)
4- Now you've done it, :evil: I don't know which to discard from my list the 70-300 or 70-400

Thanks for sharing.
1. I used a level of 2 on Focus magic (the same level I use for the 70-200G...I use a 4 or 5 for my Tamron 200-500). I'd say it is as sharp at these apertures as the 70-200G (mind you that i have used this lens for all of 15 min.)
2.If find I have no problem with the knobs and tightening. Be warned that the 70-400 will roll off a table (caught fortunately) when sitting on the tripod foot and no camera.
3.In the 2nd bird image....that is a tree, a swing set and a bush in the BG....'nough said? Yes they are cropped a small amount.
4.I say go for the 70-400 if you can spare the extra coin.....more distance and better construction/features
Image
calpon
Initiate
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:35 pm

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by calpon »

rogprov wrote:Very nice, thanks for sharing ... be great to see them compared at maximum extension :)
If I have time after getting home from work and before packing for my trip, I will set one up.
Image
rogprov
Oligarch
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:10 am
Location: Gloucester, UK
Contact:

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by rogprov »

calpon wrote:
rogprov wrote:Very nice, thanks for sharing ... be great to see them compared at maximum extension :)
If I have time after getting home from work and before packing for my trip, I will set one up.

I look forward to seeing that :)
Roger
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by bakubo »

calpon wrote:1. I used a level of 2 on Focus magic (the same level I use for the 70-200G...I use a 4 or 5 for my Tamron 200-500). I'd say it is as sharp at these apertures as the 70-200G (mind you that i have used this lens for all of 15 min.)
I didn't know that Focus Magic could be used for routine sharpening. I thought it was just a tool to try to correct a bit for photos that are out of focus and motion blur. Are you saying you use it routinely for normal, in focus shots too? Is it better than using USM or Smart Sharpen?
User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by Dusty »

Nice shots, Calpon. I'll be interested in hearing a lot more about these lenses when you get back.

Dusty
An a700, an a550 and couple of a580s, plus even more lenses (Zeiss included!).
User avatar
harveyzone
Oligarch
Posts: 162
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Worcestershire, England

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by harveyzone »

KevinBarrett wrote:When my wife sees me looking at pictures like the first three on this page, she calls it "camera p*rn."
:D

It isn't really though is it - they all have their caps on.
--
Tom
User avatar
Winston
Grand Caliph
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 5:29 pm

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by Winston »

I'm off to Egypt this Sunday. I had hoped to have the Sony 70-400 with me. The Minolta 100-400 will have to do. Not so terrible; it has served me well in Kenya and Tanzania.
Winston Mitchell
KM7D, A700, A77, A77M2, A7M3
User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA

Re: 70-400G in Atlanta

Unread post by Dusty »

Winston wrote:I'm off to Egypt this Sunday. I had hoped to have the Sony 70-400 with me. The Minolta 100-400 will have to do. Not so terrible; it has served me well in Kenya and Tanzania.
And you'll post some of your shot when you return, I hope?

I don't know which parts you're going to, but you can spend a week in the Valley of the Kings and not have enough time!

Dusty
An a700, an a550 and couple of a580s, plus even more lenses (Zeiss included!).
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests