
Flowers 2010
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: Flowers 2010
White Hibiscus (it sure reminds me something
)


- Dusty
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA
Re: Flowers 2010
A very nice Hibiscus indeed, Doc. Details? I find no EXIF info.
Dusty
Dusty
Re: Flowers 2010
Indeed a nice white Hibiscus, Dr. Harout.
The white and pink combination also is very elegant.
Yildiz
The white and pink combination also is very elegant.
Yildiz
Re: Flowers 2010
An earlier shot from past week but seems there's no escape from glare from the brightness of the sky.. : )
Butterfly Bush flower
Butterfly Bush flower
- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: Flowers 2010
# Sony DT-16-105/3.5-5.6Dusty wrote:A very nice Hibiscus indeed, Doc. Details? I find no EXIF info.
Dusty
# ISO Speed Ratings = 400
# Original Date/Time = 2010:07:01 19:20:47
# Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/160 second
# Aperture = ƒ/7.1
# Focal Length = 105 mm
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Flowers 2010
Pretty sharp for f7.1 Doc, good detail on the stamens, I don't think I've ever seen a white Hibiscus before, good one.
Ah now I can see that orange centre better on the smal violet flowers Yildiz, thanks for that, couldn't quite see it properly before, a very striking colour combination and nice looking flower arrangement, no wonder you have that one in the garden
Greg
Ah now I can see that orange centre better on the smal violet flowers Yildiz, thanks for that, couldn't quite see it properly before, a very striking colour combination and nice looking flower arrangement, no wonder you have that one in the garden
Greg
Re: Flowers 2010
Hi Greg,Greg Beetham wrote:Ah now I can see that orange centre better on the smal violet flowers Yildiz, thanks for that, couldn't quite see it properly before, a very striking colour combination and nice looking flower arrangement, no wonder you have that one in the garden![]()
Greg
If weather and light should be permissive, I can take better shots of the Butterfly Bush flower. These were taken during some bright moments, I have to say and the background is a bit distracting as you pointed out earlier.
I love unsual colour combinations and interesting formations and flowers and of course plants are wonderful sources for inspiration.
Thanks, : ))
Yildiz
Here's one from an earlier week; an Agapanthus about to bloom and take the form of a global flower head.
Re: Flowers 2010
A couple from early this evening, around 17:30 hrs.
Yildiz
Nerium oleander Rose
Edit: the name of the first flower was corrected to Nerium oleander as Greg pointed out the difference in the species. Thanks, Greg! : )
Yildiz
Nerium oleander Rose
Edit: the name of the first flower was corrected to Nerium oleander as Greg pointed out the difference in the species. Thanks, Greg! : )
Last edited by aster on Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Flowers 2010
Hi all - I'm new to this forum but thought I could show my my photo of a bluebell coming into bud. A few weeks old now of course but I'm stilll quite proud of it. Taken on my A350 with a Tamron 90mm macro lens. I've just got to work out how to!!....I think I have it.... I'd love some feedback please.
- Attachments
-
- DSC07534.jpg (155.9 KiB) Viewed 3440 times
Anna
Re: Flowers 2010
Fantastic flower pictures over the last week - great stuff
The last three of yours, Yildiz, have great colour and detail. Great to see the Doc is back as well
Anna, interesting to see a Bluebell in bud - not something I've seen photographed much. Lovely bokeh. It would be interesting, from a botanical view, to see the tip of the stem, but this shouldn't affect what is in effect a portrait. I find it difficult to judge what should be in focus and what is acceptable blurred, and I suspect this varies from viewer to viewer as the focus tells the story of the picture in this sort of shot for me. I'm undecided on this one. Looking forward to seeing more from the Tamron 90mm.
Anna, interesting to see a Bluebell in bud - not something I've seen photographed much. Lovely bokeh. It would be interesting, from a botanical view, to see the tip of the stem, but this shouldn't affect what is in effect a portrait. I find it difficult to judge what should be in focus and what is acceptable blurred, and I suspect this varies from viewer to viewer as the focus tells the story of the picture in this sort of shot for me. I'm undecided on this one. Looking forward to seeing more from the Tamron 90mm.
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
- Dusty
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA
Re: Flowers 2010
How about some wet flowers? All from my now blooming Morning Glories.
Dusty
Dusty
- Dusty
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA
Re: Flowers 2010
And a few more wet ones. Maybe I should post these in the weather today topic - it sure is wet here!
With all of these I'm a bit disappointed that the centers are blown out. There's just not enough range to get them in and not kill the texture of the flower. Maybe if I learn more PP skills, I can figure out how to fix that.
Dusty
With all of these I'm a bit disappointed that the centers are blown out. There's just not enough range to get them in and not kill the texture of the flower. Maybe if I learn more PP skills, I can figure out how to fix that.
Dusty
Re: Flowers 2010
Hello,
Nice pictures of the other people too!
Nice pictures you made here. I don't know if you are a lightroom user, but you could fix the centers easily with the tool for local adjustment, and use it to reduce the exposure.Dusty wrote: With all of these I'm a bit disappointed that the centers are blown out. There's just not enough range to get them in and not kill the texture of the flower. Maybe if I learn more PP skills, I can figure out how to fix that.
Dusty
Nice pictures of the other people too!
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Flowers 2010
Oo I could be wrong but that one looks more like an Oleander variety (with those long slender leaves) than a Desert Rose Yildiz, we've got both in the yard here, the Oleander does flower well most of the time, but I think the Desert Rose has the prettier flower of the two. I like the genuine rose as well, still one of the nicest flowers devised by Mother nature.
Greg
ps. The first pic is one of the Desert Roses, (I was experimenting with getting remote sync with a non digital Metz45 at the time)
Greg
ps. The first pic is one of the Desert Roses, (I was experimenting with getting remote sync with a non digital Metz45 at the time)
- Attachments
-
- Pct0233.jpg (83.28 KiB) Viewed 3426 times
-
- DSC01246-copy.jpg (97.31 KiB) Viewed 3426 times
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Flowers 2010
Dusty I think the centres are more just out of DOF range than anything, mostly, on a few there is a bit of overexposure of the centres as well I guess. You could experiment with exposing more for the centre if you wanted too, I'd be inclined too maybe stop down more at minus 1/3-2/3, maybe go back another couple or few paces and either zoom in a bit for the pic or crop afterwards, whatever works best, pretty flowers though.
Greg
Greg
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests