
Pat

I suppose the amount of distortion depends on which lens you use with what focal length. For this I used my 17-50mm at 50mm, obviously. At 17mm it probably wouldn't have stitchedsury wrote:Pat,
Very clean given it is a two dimensional stitch. Nice shot too. Is that perspective expected when you do
that amount of stitching? I always thought one of the drawbacks of stitching is the loss of the perspective
compared to a wide angle and image tends to be "flat". But I may well be wrong to think that way. What stitching
SW did you use?
With best regards,
Sury
Wildieswife wrote:For this I used my 17-500mm at 50mm, obviously.
Pat,Wildieswife wrote:I suppose the amount of distortion depends on which lens you use with what focal length. For this I used my 17-50mm at 50mm, obviously. At 17mm it probably wouldn't have stitchedsury wrote:Pat,
Very clean given it is a two dimensional stitch. Nice shot too. Is that perspective expected when you do
that amount of stitching? I always thought one of the drawbacks of stitching is the loss of the perspective
compared to a wide angle and image tends to be "flat". But I may well be wrong to think that way. What stitching
SW did you use?
With best regards,
SuryMy 90mm Macro does quite good stitches as it distorts even less - but the amount of images needed for this particular image would have been over 100. I have done stitches with my 300mm lens before now.
This image was done over 180o with about 5 or 6 sweeps from side to side and moving upwards. That way the future layers are predictable.
I use CS4 (yes that old) to PP. I sort the RAWs out exposure wise, clarity etc en masse then save as jpgs. These I put in a droplet to reduce the size to 300dpi and 1000px max.
Then I load into PS as layers, select layers>edit >align layers by content. I find this works better than a single command to create a pano. After this I can switch the layers on and off to see what is what. I can discard any layers I don't need or find ones that have gone astray and are hiding under others. It happens - PS is not perfect. I can use the move tool to reposition any of the layers if I want.
Then I blend, flatten and treat the image the way I would any other - carefully cleaning up, dodging, burning, curves etc etc.
Pat


Yes, we have lots of Canadian Snow Birds in Hawaii (and Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, Florida, etc.).Wildieswife wrote:Now there's a pano well worth looking at large! Great work and great framing/subject. I'm sure there's a plot to get me to go to Hawaii (fat chance) as one of my Canadian friends is there now. It looks an amazing place with the active volcanoes and black lava flows.
If I win the lottery...........
Introducing her to photography in the classic way? A good idea to let children play with old cameras. Think I'll do that with my Grandson, later onMarcell Nikolausz wrote: My daughter holds an old pentax camera:
Marcell
I suppose it's a cure for SADS and cabin fever ?bakubo wrote:
Yes, we have lots of Canadian Snow Birds in Hawaii (and Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, Florida, etc.).


That is excellent, I like it a lot.bfitzgerald wrote:I have not shot a panoramic for some time so this will have to do one of the earlier shots I got with a Dynax 5d
Dingle Bay

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests